Legal Opinion

Wall v. . Bain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1942PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The appeal presents two questions: Whether there was any evidence of negligence on the part of defendant to take the case to the jury, and whether the conduct of the boy who met his death in the accident was, as a matter of law, contributorily negligent.

There could be little dispute as to the principles of law involved in the decision of these questions. It is true, as suggested in defendant’s brief, that what constitutes negligence is a matter of law; and this principle will be applied in examining plaintiff’s evidence on a question of nonsuit. But there are other more searching formulae to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Clark v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Taulborg v. AndresenNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Neal v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API