Legal Opinion

Cole v. Koonce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

It is a familiar rule that a judgment of involuntary nonsuit on the ground of contributory negligence of the plaintiff cannot be rendered unless the evidence is so clear on that issue that reasonable *191minds could draw no other inference. Pearson v. Luther, 212 N. C., 412, 193 S. E., 739; Mulford v. Hotel Co., 213 N. C., 603; Corum v. Tobacco Co., 205 N. C., 213, 171 S. E., 78. This rule has nothing to do with the credibility of witnesses. It applies equally to the testimony of the plaintiff as to that of other witnesses; Tomberlin v. Bachtel, 211 N. C., 265, 268, 189 S. E., 769; Matthews v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Corum v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Mulford v. Cotton States Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Lee v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API