Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Murray v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClarkson, J.
Civil action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly resulting from actionable negligence.
Plaintiff was injured on morning of 1 February, 1939, by an automobile operated by defendant, Mrs. Norman Elliott, while he was at work as a member of a bridge force of defendant, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, composed of seven others and the foreman, J. T. Daily, engaged in repairing or reflooring the grade crossing where the Plymouth-Tarboro Branch of said defendant's railroad intersects with the State Highway from Robersonville to Bethel in the State of North Carolina.
On the trial…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.