State v. Sneeden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHusKins, J.
Defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to strike the statement by the prosecuting witness Mary Jo Welch that after she felt something hit her on the head she didn’t remember what happened until “I guess I came to and he was in the act of raping me.” Defendant argues that the statement is a conclusion of the witness which invaded the province of the jury and should have been excluded.
Carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will is rape. State v. Crawford, 260 N.C. 548, 133 S.E. 2d 232. The slightest penetration of the sexual organ of the female by the sexual organ of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.