Legal Opinion
Tamerlane Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 29, 2008No. 05-677CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND PLENARY OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS ON MERITS
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
Issues involving the timeliness of the complaint in this case have been bandied about *726for over two years. Although plaintiffs were not invited to join the omnibus settlement of several hundred cases for which liability had been determined, see Franconia Assocs. v. United States, 536 U.S. 129, 122 S.Ct. 1993, 153 L.Ed.2d 132 (2002) (holding that enactment of Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987 was…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meryl Squires-Cannon v. Forest Preserve District of CCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Tamerlane, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Parkwood Associates Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Barlow & Haun, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Sunapee Difference, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.