Legal Opinion

Meryl Squires-Cannon v. Forest Preserve District of C

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 26, 2018No. 16-3131PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton, Circuit Judge.

*800 The Forest Preserve District of Cook County, Illinois, has been trying to acquire a 400-acre estate in Barrington after the owners defaulted on a mortgage and note held by the Forest Preserve. The Forest Preserve foreclosed and then bought the property at the foreclosure auction. The original owners have expressed their opposition by filing five lawsuits of their own, in addition to raising affirmative defenses and counterclaims in the still-pending foreclosure action. This appeal arises in the owners' third federal lawsuit, in which they have alleged unconstitutional…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Kevin Harer v. Shane CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Zummo v. City of Chi.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. The Forest Preserve District of Cook County v. Royalty Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. McGinley Partners, LLC v. Royalty Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. Ahern v. FlemingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API