Legal Opinion
Tamerlane, Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 22, 2008No. 2008-5071PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARE, District Judge.
In 2005, Appellants Park Terrace Limited (“Park Terrace”) and Mullica West Limited (“Mullica”) filed this lawsuit against the United States alleging, inter alia, that the government had breached loan contracts between itself and the parties. Appellants appeal from a final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing the lawsuit on the ground that the claims accrued in 1991 and 1992 and are, therefore, barred by the six- year statute of limitations of the Tucker Act. Tamerlane, Ltd. v. United States, 80 Fed.Cl. 724 (2008). We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Don Applegate and Gayle Applegate (For Themselves and a Class of Others Similarly Situated, Totalling 271) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Milmark Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Fredericksburg Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Wagstaff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.