Legal Opinion
Cramer v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1950No. Civ. 17339PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
J.—The question for decision is whether the action of the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County in vacating a public road was so arbitrary as to constitute fraud. Having granted judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint does not state a cause of action, the judgment of dismissal was entered.
The substance of the complaint is that “Sheriff Road” is á duly dedicated road; it entered plaintiffs’ property and was a means of access thereto and has been regularly used by plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest and by the owners of adjacent properties; on July 10, 1941,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Spencer v. City of CalipatriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heist v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ransom v. Los Angeles City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ratchford v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Norcross v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Sladovich v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.