Legal Opinion

Norcross v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1968No. Civ. 8700PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

This action arises out of a dispute between owners of property abutting an abandoned county road respecting their rights in and to the strip of land formerly constituting the road. Plaintiffs (husband and wife) brought this action to enjoin defendants (the Adams, Degenharts and Jacquarts) from building upon and fencing off portions of the road, for a decree adjudging plaintiffs to be the owners of a permanent easement over it for ingress and egress, and for damages. Defendants countered with a cross-complaint to quiet title and for damages. The court denied the relief sought by plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Roberts v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  3. Ratchford v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Mikels v. RagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Hazel Green Ranch, LLC v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API