Legal Opinion
Heist v. County of Colusa
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1984No. Civ. 22737PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment which found the abandonment of Laux Road by the Colusa County Board of Supervisors was valid. He asserts the trial court did not properly review the proceeding, arguing: (1) the act of abandoning a county road is judicial in nature, subject to review under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. He further argues that (2) the board of supervisors failed to make adequate findings, (3) there was a total lack of evidence to show the public will benefit by the abandonment, (4) the trial court did not rule on his motion for judicial notice, and (5)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Charpentier v. Von GeldernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Howard v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Balch Enterprises, Inc. v. New Haven Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.