Legal Opinion
Ransom v. Los Angeles City High School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1954No. Civ. 20231PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal of a taxpayers’ suit brought to enjoin the intended dedication of a right of way by defendant Los Angeles City High School District, and to enjoin the intended expenditure of funds by defendant district for improvement of the same.
The plaintiffs, Walter Ransom, Ab Waxman, William Burroughs, Bernard Jackson, Louise Morehouse, Elyse Byler and Marie Long are resident taxpayers in Los Angeles City High School District. The defendants are the district and the individual members of the Board of Education for said district.
On July 30, 1953, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roman Catholic Welfare Corp. v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Clay v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Evry v. TrembleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Babcock v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.