Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ratchford v. County of Sonoma

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1972No. Civ. 28036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J. —

Petitioner-appellant, the owner of property abutting upon a mapped subdivision road, which was offered for dedication to public use but never accepted, has appealed from a judgment, “Order Denying Petition,” which denied her any relief after reviewing proceedings in which the board of supervisors, by resolution, ordered a triangular portion of a mapped road, upon which a comer of a residence had been constructed, abandoned upon finding that it was a part of a purported county road unnecessary for either present or prospective public use.

Preliminarily the respondents contend…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. ZACK'S, INC. v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Heist v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Kinney v. OvertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API