Legal Opinion
Maaso v. Signer
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 2012No. B228314PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*366Opinion
DOI TODD, Acting P. J.
Per A. Maaso, by and through his guardian ad litem, George Richard Martin, sued Stephen Signer, M.D., for medical malpractice. The case was ordered to binding contractual arbitration before a panel of three arbitrators. Two of the three arbitrators found that Maaso failed to prove causation, and an arbitration award was issued in favor of Signer. The trial court vacated the award on the ground that it was procured by “undue means,” based on ex parte contact between Signer’s party arbitrator and the neutral arbitrator while the award was pending, and ordered the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hoteles Condado Beach, La Concha and Convention Center v. Union De Tronquistas Local 901Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,863 A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. William F. McCollough Jeanene McCollough Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Ashburn v. AIG Financial Advisors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Comerica Bank v. HowsamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Li-Lin Sung Lee v. California Capital InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Baker Marquart LLP v. Kantor, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.