Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 20, 2002No. C038339, C038343, C038735PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
In these consolidated appeals we determine whether the trial court erred in vacating the arbitration award of $88,479,713 for fees and expenses in settlement of Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 449 [89 Cal.Rptr.2d 333] (Jordan), the case that held the smog impact fee was unconstitutional. We also address a challenge to the validity of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6909, subdivision (b) (section 6909(b)), the statute that authorized the arbitration.
Although we recognize the limited scope of judicial review of an arbitration award under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sanchez v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Johnson v. Gruma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.