Legal Opinion
Blatt v. Farley
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1990No. C005997PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case arising out of a contractual commercial arbitration conducted pursuant to rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), we discuss the difference between a “submission agreement” and a “demand for arbitration.”
Respondent John Farley prevailed in the contractual arbitration of a dispute concerning investment advice given by his investment advisor, appellants Sun West Sports and Associates and its sole proprietor Michael T. Blatt (collectively Blatt). The trial court confirmed the award. Blatt appeals, contending the arbitrators (1) exceeded their authority by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Berman v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Delta Lines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 468California Court of Appeal · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marshall v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Miranda v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Fagelbaum & Heller LLP v. SmylieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ikerd v. Warren T. Merrill & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.