Legal Opinion

Common Council of Jackson v. Harrington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1910No. Calendar No. 23,933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus by the common council of the city of Jackson to compel Jode Harrington, city recorder, to give official notice of a resolution declaring for a general revision of relator’s charter.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

On February 21, 1910, relator, by a vote of three-fourths of its members, passed a resolution declaring for a general charter revision of the charter of the city of Jackson, directing that the question be submitted to the electors at the next municipal election, to be held April 4, 1910, and further directing the recorder of the city (respondent herein) to give notice of the submission of said question by posting and publication. This action of relator was taken under . section 18, Act No. 279, Pub. Acts 1909. The title of the act is as follows:

“An act to provide for the incorporation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People ex rel. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Pratt Food Co. v. BirdMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Board of Control v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gallup v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Conroy v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Streat v. VermilyaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Schadt v. LatchfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API