Legal Opinion

Pratt Food Co. v. Bird

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1907No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Wiest, J. Bill by the Pratt Food Company against Arthur C. Bird, State dairy and food commissioner, to enjoin the publishing of a bulletin warning the public against buyr ing or selling complainant’s preparations. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The bill in this case is filed to restrain the defendant, his clerks, and employés from writing, printing, issuing, publishing, or sending out any bulletin, writing, publication, or notice, to the effect that complainant’s preparations, sold as Pratt’s Food for Horses and Cattle, Pratt’s Poultry Food, and Pratt’s Animal Regulator, or either of them, are not licensed under Act No. 12, Pub. Acts 1905, and warning the public against buying or selling these preparations. The bill sets out that the defendant asserts and claims that these preparations come within the terms of the act, and that,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Beck v. Railway Teamsters' Protective UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Kenamore v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. People v. GadwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Arbuckle v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Westgate v. Township of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Beacon Club v. Kalamazoo County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Mitchell v. Grand Lodge, Free & Accepted MasonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Ladd v. District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API