Schadt v. Latchford
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Justice:
The City of Wilmington enacted an ordinance that imposed upon private landowners holding property adjacent to the City’s public sidewalks a duty to repair and maintain abutting public sidewalks. The ordinance imposes sole responsibility for damages for a breach of that duty upon the private landowner. Plaintiff/Appellee successfully contended below that Defendants/Appellants property owners negligently breached their duty to keep the City owned sidewalks safe for pedestrians. A jury awarded her compensation for her personal injuries resulting from that breach.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Co. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilhelm v. RyanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Bonito Partners, LLC v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Lemos v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Crown Castle Fiber LLC v. City of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- FMC Corporation v. New Castle County Special Services DepartmentSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.