Legal Opinion

Board of Control v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1907No. Calendar No. 22,424½PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus by the board of control of the Michigan State prison to compel James B. Bradley, auditor general, to draw a warrant upon the State treasurer under the provisions of Act No. 311, Pub. Acts 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The legislature of 1907 passed an ■act known as Act No.-311, Pub. Acts 1907, and entitled:

“An act to provide for the installation, maintenance, equipment and operation of a twine and cordage plant to be operated by prison labor at the State prison at Jackson, Michigan, to provide for the sale and disposition of the manufactured product; to define the duties of the warden and board of control of said prison in relation thereto; to make an appropriation for the fiscal year ending June thirty, nineteen hundred eight, to carry into effect the object and purposes of this bill and to provide a tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gale v. Supervisor of OnondagaMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Fuller v. ParsellMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stow v. Common Council of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Sharp v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. LeRoux v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Beacon Club v. Kalamazoo County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Common Council of Jackson v. HarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In Re Application of FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API