Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. State Treasurer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1875PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

This application for mandamus has originated in a difference of opinion between the treasurer and the relator, respecting the amount of specific tax wbicb was by law demandable from the company for the year 1873.

The company is a Connecticut corporation, doing business in this state under the regulations prescribed by the legislature, and it claims to be working as a mutual company, without capital stock issued to shareholders, but embracing the holders of policies as members, who are rendered proportionably interested in the property and profits.

It further claims that it aims to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. People ex rel. Secretary of State v. State InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. HerriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Welch, Ins. Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. New England Mut. Life Ins. v. ReeceTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API