Legal Opinion
In Re Amalgamated Development Co., Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 1977No. 10907PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
H. Lawrence Blasius and Amalgamated Development Co., Inc., here seek review of an order enjoining them from practicing law in the District of Columbia after a hearing in which the following facts were found. 1
Petitioner Blasius is the principal owner and operator of Amalgamated Development Co., Inc., trading as the Washington Patent Office Search Bureau, a District of Columbia corporation. 2 He is not, nor does he hold himself out to be, a member of the District of Columbia bar or licensed to practice before the United States Patent Office.
Petitioner places…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Harold Lawrence BlasiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re RubinfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simons v. BellingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Oregon State Bar v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Ex Parte Ninth Judicial Circuit v. In re Bradley Rowland MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Simons v. BellingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980