Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ninth Judicial Circuit v. In re Bradley Rowland Marshall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 25, 2019No. 27919Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Ex Parte Ninth Judicial Circuit Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson, Petitioner. In re Bradley Rowland Marshall, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2017-001951 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Opinion No. 27919 Submitted August 15, 2019 – Filed September 25, 2019 JUDGMENT DECLARED Benjamin Chad Simpson, of Charleston, for Petitioner. Bradley Rowland Marshall, of Mt. Pleasant, pro se. PER CURIAM: We agreed to hear this declaratory judgment action in our original jurisdiction to determine whether Respondent has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. In Re MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API