Legal Opinion

Oregon State Bar v. Ortiz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 1986No. 82-12-172; CA A33222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff brought this proceeding to enjoin defendant, a nonlawyer, from engaging in what the Bar contends is the unauthorized practice of law. For several years defendant has advised and assisted people — up to 35 per year — in the preparation of applications for citizenship and immigration visas. He is fluent in Spanish and English and also acts as a translator for his primarily Spanish-speaking clients. He charges fees for his services. Plaintiff prayed for injunctive relief. Defendant was held to have been practicing law, and an appropriate injunction was issued. We affirm.

In his two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Oregon State Bar v. Security Escrows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re Amalgamated Development Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Oregon State Bar v. FowlerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lefkowitz v. Lawrence Peska Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Trustee v. Tank (In Re Stacy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API