Legal Opinion

Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 24, 1961No. 28PublishedCited by 492 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This case, involving California’s second rejection of petitioner’s application for admission to the state bar, is a sequel to Konigsberg v. State Bar, 353 U. S. 252, in which this Court reversed the State’s initial refusal of his application.

Under California law the State Supreme Court may admit to the practice of law any applicant whose qualifications have been certified to it by the California Committee of Bar Examiners. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6064. To qualify for certification an applicant must, among other things, be of “good moral character,” id., § 6060 (c), and no person may be…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by492 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  5. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

487 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API