Legal Opinion

Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1963No. 322PublishedCited by 348 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren

Petitioner is a practitioner registered to practice before the United States Patent Office. He has not been admitted to practice law before the Florida or any other baf. Alleging, among other things, that petitioner “is engaged in the unauthorized practice. of law, in that although' he is not a member of The Florida Bar, he nevertheless maintains an office ... in Tampa, Florida, . . . holds himself oút to the public as a Patent Attorney . . .• represents Florida clients before the United States Patent Office, ... has rendered opinions as to patentability, and . . . has prepared various legal…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by348 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  5. Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API