Legal Opinion
In re Rubinfield
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 22, 1959No. 6397PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Chief Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of the three claims of appellant’s application for a patent on a design for a floor waxer. The appealed claims are as follows:
1. The ornamental design for a Floor Waxer substantially as shown in Figures 1 to 4, inclusive.
2. The ornamental design for a Floor Waxer substantially as shown in Figures 5 to 8, inclusive.
3. The ornamental design for a Floor Waxer having the common appearance substantially as shown in Figures 1 to 8, inclusive.
Appellant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Geo. Borgfeldt & Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Robert W. Lee D/B/A Rollo-Laxer v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation D/B/A Target Stores and Matrix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Pacific Coast Marine Windshields Ltd. v. Malibu Boats, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- In Re: MaatitaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- KeyStone Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. v. Westrock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- In re ZahnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.