In Re Banks
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
These cumulative appeals challenge in substance an adjudication of civil contempt and a later conviction for criminal contempt both resulting from appellant’s disregard of injunctions issued by this court against the unauthorized practice of law. He presents a barrage of arguments why both of those adjudications exceed our authority to regulate his conduct, in particular his business of representing persons before federal and local administrative agencies. We sustain the contempt orders in all respects and uphold as well the order directing appellant to pay partial…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Banks v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bergman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Larry Klayman v. Julia PorterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.