Zuhn v. Horst
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Brawley, J., entered December 29, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Respondent, mother of the deceased wife of William Neihoff, deceased, brought this action against the administrator of William Neihoff’s estate to recover the value of household services rendered the deceased and his family prior to the death of the deceased and his wife. In her complaint, she alleged that the services were rendered at Danville, Illinois, between August, 1898, and December 24, 1905, and were of the reasonable value of $60 per month; that the consideration for such services was an oral promise made by William Neihoff in August, 1898, that he and his wife would provide…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Morrissey v. FaucettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Hodge v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Liberman v. GurenskyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Empson v. FortuneWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Weideman v. Estate of PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Colwell v. EisingWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Allerton v. AllertonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.