Weideman v. Estate of Peterson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This action arises out of a claim against the estate of Neils P. Peterson, deceased, which, at the time of the hearing thereon in the county court, was in the following form (verification omitted) :
*76“Estate of Neils P. Peterson, Deceased.
In Account With
Dr Cr
16 1922-3 Trip to Blair
24 2 Trip's to Fremont
45 3 Trips to Kennard, Neb.
10 1923 Cleaning House — Greenwood
” Nursing- — -Taking care of N. P. 3 wks 150
1931 Trip to Fremont 12
257
That said deceased promised and agreed with claimant that he would pay said claim by providing for its payment in his will which he failed to do.”
To this claim the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Devine v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Scarborough v. MyrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Murtha v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- O'Donohue v. HendrixNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Vore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Sedlak v. DudaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Ehlers v. LindekugelNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.