Legal Opinion

Weideman v. Estate of Peterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. 29200PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This action arises out of a claim against the estate of Neils P. Peterson, deceased, which, at the time of the hearing thereon in the county court, was in the following form (verification omitted) :

*76“Estate of Neils P. Peterson, Deceased.

In Account With

Dr Cr

16 1922-3 Trip to Blair

24 2 Trip's to Fremont

45 3 Trips to Kennard, Neb.

10 1923 Cleaning House — Greenwood

” Nursing- — -Taking care of N. P. 3 wks 150

1931 Trip to Fremont 12

257

That said deceased promised and agreed with claimant that he would pay said claim by providing for its payment in his will which he failed to do.”

To this claim the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Devine v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Scarborough v. MyrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Murtha v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. O'Donohue v. HendrixNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Vore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Sedlak v. DudaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ehlers v. LindekugelNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API