Colwell v. Eising
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
The plaintiffs and defendant were the general partners in a limited partnership. The limited partnership purchased, managed and eventually sold its sole asset, a commercial office building, the Seattle Tower, formerly the Northern Life Tower (the Tower).
Plaintiffs, as general partners, sued defendant, the third general partner, for two-thirds of management fees paid by the limited partnership. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant on the basis that the action was barred by the statute of limitations and laches. We affirm on the statute of limitations and do not reach the issue…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- New York Life Insurance v. KuhlenschmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Lybecker v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Arlyn W. Nordhorn v. Ladish Company, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation Armco, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sabey v. Howard Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.