Legal Opinion

Empson v. Fortune

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1918No. 14466PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered February 7, 1917, upon findings favorable to the plaintiff, in an action on a supersedeas bond, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPabkeb, J.

Alice Empson seeks recovery upon a supersedeas bond executed by John Fqrtune and Jacob Kreielsheimer, as sureties, and Hayes & Porter, Incorporated, as principal. Trial in the superior court for King county resulted in findings and judgment in favor of Alice Empson, awarding her recovery against John Fortune, but denying her recovery against the executors of the estate of Jacob Kreielsheimer, deceased. John Fortune has appealed from the judgment rendered against him, and Alice Empson has appealed from the judgment in so far as it denies her recovery against the estate of Jacob Kreielsheimer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barto v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Zuhn v. HorstWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Seattle National Bank v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Butterworth v. BredemeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Loving v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  4. First Security & Loan Co. v. EnglehartWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. In re the Estate of ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API