Muir v. Kane
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The respondent brought this action to recover of the appellants the sum of $200, alleged to be due pursuant to a written agreement executed and delivered to him by the appellants, whereby they agreed to pay him the sum of $200 for his services in selling for appellants a certain tract of real property. Issue was taken on the complaint and a trial had thereon, which resulted in a judgment in his favor for the amount claimed to be due. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury. No question is raised as to the correctness of the facts found, but the case is here on the question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bailey v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Stout v. HumphreySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Stout v. EnnisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Voorhis v. Whipple & HawesNew York Supreme Court · 1810
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.