Eachus v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and from an order denying defendant :a new trial.
The action was brought to recover damages caused by the excavation of First street in front of plaintiffs’ lot. Plaintiffs were the owners of a lot in the city of Los Angeles, bounded on the east by Boylston street, on the west by an alley, and on the south by First street, said lot being a rectangle fifty feet wide by one hundred and forty-two feet long running lengthwise along the north side of First street. The defendant, by ordinance duly adopted, 'established; the grade of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by37 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.