Clay v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
Is a homeowner entitled to redress in the courts for the failure of a municipality to take any action by way of either restoring, or vacating with just compensation to the homeowner, a city street which has been washed out by flood, when the circumstances are such that the homeowner’s property has been rendered totally inaccessible?
Plaintiffs Mr. and Mrs. Clay (hereinafter plaintiffs) claim that they are entitled to such redress and attempted to assert their claim by filing a complaint for damages against the City of Los Angeles (hereinafter defendant), an action which is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ehlinger v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- City of Lafayette v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ellison v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Cardoza v. Town of Silver CityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Burg v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.