Reardon v. City of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment. The judgment roll alone constitutes the record. The complaint states that the plaintiffs, during the times referred to in it, were the lessees of four certain lots of land on the south-west corner of the San Bruno road and Army street, in the city and county aforesaid, upon which they had constructed a store-house and two dwelling-houses, one of which dwelling-houses they had rented, and the other buildings were used and occupied by them ; that on or about the first of March, 1880, the defendant, by its legally constituted officers and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Conrad v. . the Trustees of the Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.