Legal Opinion

Butters v. City of Oakland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 12, 1923No. 16PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Plaintiffs in error brought suit to restrain the defendants from making or recording an assessment of improvement taxes against plaintiffs’ properties, made under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911, California Statutes, 1911, pp. 730-769. The improvement consists of certain street grading in the City of Oakland, together with various structures, such as culverts, etc., in connection therewith.

The authority to order such improvements is vested by the statute in the City Council, which, before making an order, must pass a resolution of intention to do so, setting forth specified…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Embree v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Martin v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jack Malamud v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Road Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Clay v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Schiff v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API