State v. Villagomez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890, and possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. Additionally, the jury found that the state had proved three “commercial drug offense” factors, allowing enhanced sentences for both of those convictions. See ORS 475.900(l)(b) (providing that, if a defendant is convicted of certain drug offenses, the crime seriousness category under the sentencing guidelines grid for those offenses shall be increased to 8, if the state proves three of the “commercial drug offense” factors listed in ORS 475.900(l)(b)(A)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norwood v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. VillagomezOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. CraigenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 2018