Norwood v. Premo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
LINDER, S. J.
The issue presented in this post-conviction appeal is whether a defense lawyer exercising reasonable professional skill and judgment would have challenged the evidence at petitioner’s criminal trial as insufficient to establish that he was armed with a deadly weapon during his commission of a burglary. To resolve that issue, we must determine whether an unloaded firearm qualifies as a “deadly weapon” when the firearm is contained in a closed, zippered carrying case and is possessed together with a separate bag that contains ammunition for the firearm. As we will explain, we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. MeiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Decker v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Decker v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.