Legal Opinion

State v. Moeller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1991No. CC 89-1379; CA A65221; CC 89-1380; CA A65222; CC 89-1410; CA A65223; CC 89-1411; CA A65224; CC 89-1422; CA A65225; CC 89-1423; CA A65226; SC S37943PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves demurrers challenging certain penal law provisions for vagueness.1 After this court allowed review of these consolidated cases, State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev allowed 311 Or 349, 811 P2d 144 (1991), the 1991 Legislative Assembly superseded the penal provisions that gave rise to the challenge. Or Laws 1991, ch 690, § 1 (HB 2390 B-Eng § 1) (effective July 25, 1991). Accordingly, the court has determined that the order granting review of the Court of Appeals’ decision should be dismissed.

Review dismissed.

The words challenged were “as part of a * * * scheme…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Long v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API