Legal Opinion

State v. Villagomez

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2018No. CC 13CR08907; SC S064507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of unlawful possession and unlawful delivery of methamphetamine. The presumptive sentence for those crimes is probation. However, under ORS 475.900(1)(b), when the state establishes that those crimes constituted commercial drug offenses, the presumptive sentence is imprisonment. To prove a commercial drug offense, the state must establish any three out of eleven statutorily enumerated factors, one of which is that the "delivery" of the drug was "for consideration." This case requires us to determine whether that factor may be proved by evidence that the defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Moyer v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Mason v. BCK Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API