State v. Moeller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendants in these consolidated cases were charged with either possession, manufacture or delivery of controlled substances, in violation of ORS 475.992. The indictments charged, in addition to the underlying offenses, that the crimes “occurred as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network” under OAR chapter 253, division 4, appendix 4 (the rule). See OAR 253-04-002(3). Under the sentencing guidelines statutes and rules, that allegation increases the “crime-seriousness” rating of the charged offense and subjects a convicted defendant to a greater “presumptive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.