State v. Stewart
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
A jury convicted defendant of one count of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine for consideration, ORS 475.890 and ORS 475.900(2)(a), and one count of possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. On appeal, defendant challenges only the delivery conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal as to the subcategory factor found in ORS 475.900(2)(a), which applies when the delivery in question “is for consideration.” Relying on our recent decision in State v. Villagomez, 281 Or App 29, 36, 380 P3d 1150 (2016), defendant argues that paragraph (2)(a)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. MailmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Murdoch v. DMVCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. Garcia-CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.