Dept. of Transportation v. Stallcup
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
The issue in this condemnation case is whether ORS 35.346(5)(b) requires the parties to a condemnation action to disclose every written opinion of value prepared by an appraiser, including draft appraisals and other preliminary reports. After the condemnation trial below, the state moved, pursuant to ORCP 71 B and C, to set aside the judgment based upon newly discovered evidence that petitioner had not disclosed a certain report that, the state claimed, was an “appraisal” subject to mandatory disclosure under ORS 35.346(5)(b). The trial court denied that motion, because it concluded that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.