Legal Opinion

Gassner v. McCarthy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1911No. S.F. No. 5711PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The purpose of this action is to test the validity of proceedings instituted by the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco, looking to a change of grade on two blocks of Stockton Street in said city and the construction of a tunnel under two other blocks of said street. The steps taken provide for the assessment of the cost of the proposed work and the damage to be caused thereby upon a district declared to be specially benefited. The plaintiff, an owner of property fronting on Stockton Street, within the proposed district, brought this action to enjoin the mayor, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hyatt v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Foxen v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hayes v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API