Legal Opinion

Egan v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1913No. S.F. No. 6526PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff, as a taxpayer of the city and county of San Francisco, brought this action to enjoin the carrying out of the terms of a certain agreement, entered into between the city and county and the Musical Association of San Francisco, and looking to the erection and management of an opera house. He also sought to have the agreement, and an ordinance authorizing its execution, declared null and void. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and judgment in favor of the defendants entered. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The agreement in question, briefly stated, after reciting…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Spires v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. City & County of Denver v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Kingman v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API