Foxen v. City of Santa Barbara
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff obtained a judgment for something more than four thousand dollars against the city of Santa Barbara for personal injuries sustained by him from an explosion which occurred in a certain tunnel in which he was working. The said tunnel was being excavated into and through the Santa Ynez range of mountains for the purpose of developing a supply of water for use in the municipal water system of the city of Santa Barbara. The case was tried by the court, both sides having waived a trial by jury. From the judgment against it the defendant appeals.
The defendant, which is a municipal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Perry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Chicago v. HanreddyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Visher v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People ex rel. Harris v. RizzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.