Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1998No. 95-06-35762; CA A92003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a schedule II controlled substance. ORS 475.992 (1). We reverse.

The pertinent facts in this case are undisputed. Defendant was a passenger in a pick-up truck that was stopped in a driveway in southeast Portland by Portland Police Sergeant Larsen for failure to signal for a turn. A second police officer, Warren, arrived soon after the truck was stopped. Defendant was one of two passengers seated in the passenger compartment. Warren recognized the middle passenger and had seen defendant before. He asked defendant her name and birth date. Warren…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. Herrera-SorrosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. MastinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API