Legal Opinion

State v. Aguilar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1996No. C88-06-33882; CA A70129PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*177DEITS, J.

Defendant appealed from his convictions for possession and distribution of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirmed the trial court’s denial of the motion, 126 Or App 22, 867 P2d 520 (1994). The Supreme Court has remanded for reconsideration, State v. Aguilar, 321 Or 378, 899 P2d 690 (1995), in the light of State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or 206, 895 P2d 306 (1995). We reverse and remand.

On June 4, 1988, Officer Kelley saw defendant get into a car parked in front of what he believed to be an operating drug…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BeaOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Walther v. SAIF CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MoyaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. LanigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. SennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API