Legal Opinion

State v. Fugate

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1998No. 96-0660-C; CA A96628PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*645LANDAU, J.

Defendant was charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The trial court granted defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence of alcohol-related impairment, and the state appeals. The state contends that Senate Bill 936 (SB 936), although enacted by the 1997 Legislative Assembly after the trial court’s decision in this case, applies to this case and compels reversal. Defendant contends that the recently enacted legislation cannot be applied to this case on various constitutional grounds. We reject defendant’s constitutional contentions,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Thompson v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. FugateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. FleetwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Thompson-SeedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API