Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1991No. CC 10-88-08835; CA A51130; SC S37485PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether, after discovering and seizing evidence of an open container violation 1 — an open can containing beer — an officer lawfully searched defendant’s car for additional open containers. We hold that the search was unlawful and that the trial court should have suppressed evidence that resulted from it. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court. State v. Porter, 102 Or App 22, 792 P2d 471 (1990).

The trial court made no findings of fact when it ruled on the motion to suppress evidence. For…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jorge Miranda Irene Miranda v. City of Cornelius Acme Towing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API